Re: [PATCH v14 14/21] xfs: add flags to xfs_free_eofblocks() to pass down to block processing
"Darrick J. Wong via Linux-f2fs-devel" <[email protected]> Tue, 4 Aug 2026 11:18:48 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.file-systems.f2fs,gmane.linux.file-systems,gmane.comp.file-systems.ext4,gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20260804181848.GM3556460@frogsfrogsfrogs> |
On Mon, Aug 03, 2026 at 10:08:04PM +0200, Andrey Albershteyn wrote: > Add a flags parameter to xfs_free_eofblocks() to support selective > extent unmapping. Add two flags for unmapping all extents (unwritten and > normal) and fsverity leftover extents (only unwritten ones, leaving > normal in place). Er, why do we need this? Is this to clear out unwritten merkle tree blocks after a failed fsverity enrollment or something? The commit message should say a little bit more about why anyone needs this. > Signed-off-by: Andrey Albershteyn <[email protected]> > --- > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.h | 6 ++++- > fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c | 20 ++++++++++---- > fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.h | 13 +++++++++- > fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 2 +- > fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c | 2 +- > fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 2 +- > 7 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c > index cc48f6e20e80..1d8d157a9dfa 100644 > --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c > +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c > @@ -6144,15 +6144,12 @@ xfs_bmap_validate_extent( > XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE(ip), whichfork, irec); > } > > -/* > - * Used in xfs_itruncate_extents(). This is the maximum number of extents > - * freed from a file in a single transaction. > - */ > -#define XFS_ITRUNC_MAX_EXTENTS 2 > - > /* > * Unmap every extent in part of an inode's fork. We don't do any higher level > * invalidation work at all. > + * > + * The XFS_BMAPI_UNWRITTEN could be passed to remove only unwritten extents, > + * leaving out normal extents in place. What flags do we support here? ATTRFORK, NODISCARD, and UNWRITTEN? Can that be documented in the comment or turned into asserts? > */ > int > xfs_bunmapi_range( > @@ -6162,23 +6159,52 @@ xfs_bunmapi_range( > xfs_fileoff_t startoff, > xfs_fileoff_t endoff) > { > - xfs_filblks_t unmap_len = endoff - startoff + 1; > int error = 0; > + int nimaps = 1; > + int done = 0; > + struct xfs_bmbt_irec imap; > + int read_flags = > + flags & (XFS_BMAPI_ATTRFORK | XFS_BMAPI_ENTIRE); Why BMAPI_ENTIRE? > + xfs_exntst_t exntst = XFS_EXT_NORM; > > xfs_assert_ilocked(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL); > > - while (unmap_len > 0) { > - ASSERT((*tpp)->t_highest_agno == NULLAGNUMBER); > - error = __xfs_bunmapi(*tpp, ip, startoff, &unmap_len, flags, > - XFS_ITRUNC_MAX_EXTENTS); > + if (flags & XFS_BMAPI_UNWRITTEN) > + exntst = XFS_EXT_UNWRITTEN; > + > + while (startoff < endoff) { > + nimaps = 1; > + > + error = xfs_bmapi_read(ip, startoff, endoff - startoff + 1, > + &imap, &nimaps, read_flags); > if (error) > goto out; > > - /* free the just unmapped extents */ > - error = xfs_defer_finish(tpp); > - if (error) > + if (nimaps == 0) > goto out; > - cond_resched(); > + > + if ((exntst == XFS_EXT_UNWRITTEN) && > + (imap.br_state != exntst)) { No need for parentheses around these condition checks. Would it be clearer if this was: /* caller only wants to unmap unwritten extents */ if ((flags & XFS_BMAPI_UNWRITTEN) && imap.br_state != XFS_EXT_UNWRITTEN) { ... } > + startoff = imap.br_startoff + imap.br_blockcount; > + continue; > + } > + > + done = 0; > + while (!done) { > + ASSERT((*tpp)->t_highest_agno == NULLAGNUMBER); > + error = xfs_bunmapi(*tpp, ip, imap.br_startoff, > + imap.br_blockcount, flags, 0, &done); > + if (error) > + goto out; > + > + /* free the just unmapped extent */ > + error = xfs_defer_finish(tpp); > + if (error) > + goto out; > + cond_resched(); > + } > + > + startoff = imap.br_startoff + imap.br_blockcount; > } > out: > return error; > diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.h b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.h > index d5f2729305fa..0f36431d9936 100644 > --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.h > +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.h > @@ -90,6 +90,9 @@ struct xfs_bmalloca { > /* Try to align allocations to the extent size hint */ > #define XFS_BMAPI_EXTSZALIGN (1u << 11) > > +/* Process unwritten extents only. Used for unmapping */ > +#define XFS_BMAPI_UNWRITTEN (1u << 12) > + > #define XFS_BMAPI_FLAGS \ > { XFS_BMAPI_ENTIRE, "ENTIRE" }, \ > { XFS_BMAPI_METADATA, "METADATA" }, \ > @@ -102,7 +105,8 @@ struct xfs_bmalloca { > { XFS_BMAPI_COWFORK, "COWFORK" }, \ > { XFS_BMAPI_NODISCARD, "NODISCARD" }, \ > { XFS_BMAPI_NORMAP, "NORMAP" },\ > - { XFS_BMAPI_EXTSZALIGN, "EXTSZALIGN" } > + { XFS_BMAPI_EXTSZALIGN, "EXTSZALIGN" }, \ > + { XFS_BMAPI_UNWRITTEN, "UNWRITTEN" } > > > static inline int xfs_bmapi_aflag(int w) > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c > index c88b9ade7389..6323eac48fc8 100644 > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c > @@ -574,11 +574,13 @@ xfs_can_free_eofblocks( > */ > int > xfs_free_eofblocks( > - struct xfs_inode *ip) > + struct xfs_inode *ip, > + int flags) > { > struct xfs_trans *tp; > struct xfs_mount *mp = ip->i_mount; > int error; > + int bmapi_flags = XFS_BMAPI_NODISCARD; > > /* Attach the dquots to the inode up front. */ > error = xfs_qm_dqattach(ip); > @@ -593,15 +595,20 @@ xfs_free_eofblocks( > * > * Note that this means we also leave speculative preallocations in > * place for preallocated files. > + * > + * Clean up delalloc reservations for fsverity too as those won't be > + * used > */ > - if (ip->i_diflags & (XFS_DIFLAG_PREALLOC | XFS_DIFLAG_APPEND)) { > + if (ip->i_diflags & (XFS_DIFLAG_PREALLOC | XFS_DIFLAG_APPEND) || > + (flags & XFS_FREE_FSVERITY)) { Oh, this patch keeps going after adding new flags to xfs_bunmapi. Uh, this part should be a separate patch then. > if (ip->i_delayed_blks) { > xfs_bmap_punch_delalloc_range(ip, XFS_DATA_FORK, > round_up(XFS_ISIZE(ip), mp->m_sb.sb_blocksize), > LLONG_MAX, NULL); > } > xfs_inode_clear_eofblocks_tag(ip); > - return 0; > + if (!(flags & XFS_FREE_FSVERITY)) > + return 0; > } > > error = xfs_trans_alloc(mp, &M_RES(mp)->tr_itruncate, 0, 0, 0, &tp); > @@ -613,6 +620,9 @@ xfs_free_eofblocks( > xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL); > xfs_trans_ijoin(tp, ip, 0); > > + if (flags & XFS_FREE_FSVERITY) > + bmapi_flags |= XFS_BMAPI_UNWRITTEN; > + > /* > * Do not update the on-disk file size. If we update the on-disk file > * size and then the system crashes before the contents of the file are > @@ -620,7 +630,7 @@ xfs_free_eofblocks( > * bug). > */ > error = xfs_itruncate_extents_flags(&tp, ip, XFS_DATA_FORK, > - XFS_ISIZE(ip), XFS_BMAPI_NODISCARD); > + XFS_ISIZE(ip), bmapi_flags); > if (error) > goto err_cancel; > > @@ -928,7 +938,7 @@ xfs_prepare_shift( > * into the accessible region of the file. > */ > if (xfs_can_free_eofblocks(ip)) { > - error = xfs_free_eofblocks(ip); > + error = xfs_free_eofblocks(ip, XFS_FREE_ALL); > if (error) > return error; > } > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.h > index eaaf094154b9..9ea3000466cc 100644 > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.h > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.h > @@ -64,9 +64,20 @@ int xfs_collapse_file_space(struct xfs_inode *, xfs_off_t offset, > int xfs_insert_file_space(struct xfs_inode *, xfs_off_t offset, > xfs_off_t len); > > +/* > + * Remove all extents and reservations beyond EOF > + */ > +#define XFS_FREE_ALL 0 > + > +/* > + * Do the normal post EOF cleaning except don't remove normal extents, in other > + * words, remove unwritten, delayed allocation and cow reservations IOWs it preserves written blocks storing a merkle tree? > + */ > +#define XFS_FREE_FSVERITY 1 /me wonders if this should be XFS_FREE_EOF_{ALL,PRESERVE_MERKLE} ? Also, can we decide this from the XFS_DIFLAG2_VERITY state? --D > + > /* EOF block manipulation functions */ > bool xfs_can_free_eofblocks(struct xfs_inode *ip); > -int xfs_free_eofblocks(struct xfs_inode *ip); > +int xfs_free_eofblocks(struct xfs_inode *ip, int flags); > > int xfs_swap_extents(struct xfs_inode *ip, struct xfs_inode *tip, > struct xfs_swapext *sx); > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c > index e9927688086d..43b8fd5a25c5 100644 > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c > @@ -1827,7 +1827,7 @@ xfs_file_release( > xfs_ilock_nowait(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL)) { > if (xfs_can_free_eofblocks(ip) && > !xfs_iflags_test_and_set(ip, XFS_EOFBLOCKS_RELEASED)) > - xfs_free_eofblocks(ip); > + xfs_free_eofblocks(ip, XFS_FREE_ALL); > xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL); > } > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c > index 9d8dd30bd927..2b3601bb28c9 100644 > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c > @@ -1261,7 +1261,7 @@ xfs_inode_free_eofblocks( > *lockflags |= XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL; > > if (xfs_can_free_eofblocks(ip)) > - return xfs_free_eofblocks(ip); > + return xfs_free_eofblocks(ip, XFS_FREE_ALL); > > /* inode could be preallocated */ > trace_xfs_inode_free_eofblocks_invalid(ip); > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c > index 15279d22a894..63f346e2f1d5 100644 > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c > @@ -1436,7 +1436,7 @@ xfs_inactive( > * reference to the inode at this point anyways. > */ > if (xfs_can_free_eofblocks(ip)) > - error = xfs_free_eofblocks(ip); > + error = xfs_free_eofblocks(ip, XFS_FREE_ALL); > > goto out; > } > -- > 2.54.0 > >