Re: [PATCH v2] fuse: check for NULL root inode in fuse_fill_super_submount

Jingbo Xu <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.file-systems,gmane.linux.kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>

On 8/8/26 12:13 PM, Baokun Li wrote:
> fuse_iget() can return NULL when its inode allocation fails, but
> fuse_fill_super_submount() passed the result straight to get_fuse_inode()
> and decremented fi->nlookup without checking it:
> 
>         root = fuse_iget(sb, parent_fi->nodeid, ...);
>         fi = get_fuse_inode(root);
>         fi->nlookup--;
> 
> Inside fuse_iget() the inode allocation can fail and return NULL.  The
> submount root takes the iget5_locked() path, whose alloc_inode() can fail
> under memory pressure (the auto-submount branch can fail the same way in
> new_inode() or fuse_alloc_submount_lookup()):
> 
>         inode = iget5_locked(sb, nodeid, fuse_inode_eq, fuse_inode_set,
>                              &nodeid);
>         if (!inode)
>                 return NULL;
> 
> A NULL root makes get_fuse_inode() a container_of() on NULL and the
> nlookup decrement a write to a bogus address, oopsing the mount.  With
> CONFIG_KASAN the following null pointer dereference is reported when the
> root inode allocation of an auto-submount fails (e.g. under memory
> pressure):
> 
> ==================================================================
> BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in fuse_get_tree_submount+0x656/0x8b0
> Read of size 8 at addr 00000000000002b0 by task ls/942
> CPU: 0 PID: 942 Comm: ls Tainted: G W 6.6 #15
> Call Trace:
>  <TASK>
>  fuse_get_tree_submount+0x656/0x8b0
>  vfs_get_tree+0x48/0x140
>  fc_mount+0x13/0x50
>  fuse_dentry_automount+0x7a/0xb0
>  __traverse_mounts+0xca/0x330
>  step_into+0x339/0xac0
>  path_lookupat+0xc5/0x2f0
>  filename_lookup+0x163/0x2a0
>  vfs_statx+0xd5/0x200
>  do_statx+0x83/0xd0
>  __x64_sys_statx+0xa0/0xc0
>  do_syscall_64+0x37/0x90
>  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x78/0xe2
>  </TASK>
> ==================================================================
> 
> Return -ENOMEM instead; the caller tears down the partially built
> superblock on error, matching the other error returns in this
> function.
> 
> Fixes: 1866d779d5d2 ("fuse: Allow fuse_fill_super_common() for submounts")
> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <[email protected]>

LGTM.

Reviewed-by: Jingbo Xu \<[email protected]\>

> ---
> Changes since v1:
>  * Correct the Fixes tag.
> 
> v1: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
> 
>  fs/fuse/inode.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/inode.c b/fs/fuse/inode.c
> index d975073c6029..455c7feba057 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/fuse/inode.c
> @@ -1639,6 +1639,8 @@ static int fuse_fill_super_submount(struct super_block *sb,
>  	fuse_fill_attr_from_inode(&root_attr, parent_fi);
>  	root = fuse_iget(sb, parent_fi->nodeid, 0, &root_attr, 0, 0,
>  			 fuse_get_evict_ctr(fm->fc));
> +	if (!root)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
>  	/*
>  	 * This inode is just a duplicate, so it is not looked up and
>  	 * its nlookup should not be incremented.  fuse_iget() does

-- 
Thanks,
Jingbo
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.