Re: freetype package update changes fonts.

Jeff Pitman <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.freshrpms.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thursday 02 June 2005 15:01, Jeremy Rosengren wrote:
> Anyone else noticing that their fonts don't look as good after
> 2.1.9-1.1.fc3.rf, or am I too used to how the fonts were rendered
> using the fc3 core package?

Yes.  I played with the anti-alias hint settings for an hour or so 
trying to get the perfect setup.  But, it would almost take an 
herculean effort to tweak each font in the system with the correct 
sub-pixel hinting settings (RGB/BGR/Vertical RGB/Vertical 
BGR/Greyscale) and Hinting styles (None/Slight/Medium/Full).  It 
appears that a one size fits all policy just isn't going to work.

Obviously, we need the fonts themselves to provide what settings are 
optimal.  But, at this time, not all of them give that information.  
Some of the worst well-used fonts that have taken a blow with this new 
bytecode/hinter stuff: Anonymous, and most Chinese fonts.  I almost 
have to double up my prescription to get the words to come in clear.

Is there runtime configuration for the bytecode stuff?

-- 
-jeff
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.