Re: freetype package update changes fonts.
Jeff Pitman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.freshrpms.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thursday 02 June 2005 15:01, Jeremy Rosengren wrote: > Anyone else noticing that their fonts don't look as good after > 2.1.9-1.1.fc3.rf, or am I too used to how the fonts were rendered > using the fc3 core package? Yes. I played with the anti-alias hint settings for an hour or so trying to get the perfect setup. But, it would almost take an herculean effort to tweak each font in the system with the correct sub-pixel hinting settings (RGB/BGR/Vertical RGB/Vertical BGR/Greyscale) and Hinting styles (None/Slight/Medium/Full). It appears that a one size fits all policy just isn't going to work. Obviously, we need the fonts themselves to provide what settings are optimal. But, at this time, not all of them give that information. Some of the worst well-used fonts that have taken a blow with this new bytecode/hinter stuff: Anonymous, and most Chinese fonts. I almost have to double up my prescription to get the words to come in clear. Is there runtime configuration for the bytecode stuff? -- -jeff