Re : wxGTK2 2.6 and aMule

Amaël Broustet <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.freshrpms.user,gmane.spam.detected
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 13:15:47 +0200
> From: Matthias Saou
> 	<thias@spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.egg.and.spam.freshrpms.net>
> Subject: wxGTK2 2.6 and aMule
> To: Freshrpms list <[email protected]>
> Message-ID: <20050802131547.5a3cc647@python2>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Having waited a long time for a wxGTK fix or a wxGTK2 update in Fedora
> Extras 4, I've finally decided to rebuild my own wxGTK packages of 2.6.1
> in order to get aMule finally working. Obviously, I won't release them
> into the main freshrpms.net repository since it would mean massive
> breakage... so here they are :
> 
> http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/pub/freshrpms/fedora/linux/testing/4/wxGTK-2.6/
> 
> I don't think there is any clean way of keeping applications that use
> wxGTK 2.4.x when these packages are installed, at least not without
> providing a compatibility package/library.
> 
> For now, I'm not really sure what to do... I've thought of statically
> linking wxGTK2 2.6.1 into aMule... could be a good solution for now in
> order to not break any Extras wxGTK packages and still provide a working
> aMule package... dunno for sure, suggestions are welcome.
> 
> Matthias
> 

"statically linking wxGTK2 2.6.1 into aMule" may be the better
solution. No more dependancies problems and the packages shouldn't be 
too heavy ...

You may also provide 2 versions, "static" and "dynamic"  but this may be 
  too much (absurd) work

Amael
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.