Re : wxGTK2 2.6 and aMule
Amaël Broustet <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.freshrpms.user,gmane.spam.detected |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 13:15:47 +0200 > From: Matthias Saou > <thias@spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.egg.and.spam.freshrpms.net> > Subject: wxGTK2 2.6 and aMule > To: Freshrpms list <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <20050802131547.5a3cc647@python2> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > > Hi, > > Having waited a long time for a wxGTK fix or a wxGTK2 update in Fedora > Extras 4, I've finally decided to rebuild my own wxGTK packages of 2.6.1 > in order to get aMule finally working. Obviously, I won't release them > into the main freshrpms.net repository since it would mean massive > breakage... so here they are : > > http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/pub/freshrpms/fedora/linux/testing/4/wxGTK-2.6/ > > I don't think there is any clean way of keeping applications that use > wxGTK 2.4.x when these packages are installed, at least not without > providing a compatibility package/library. > > For now, I'm not really sure what to do... I've thought of statically > linking wxGTK2 2.6.1 into aMule... could be a good solution for now in > order to not break any Extras wxGTK packages and still provide a working > aMule package... dunno for sure, suggestions are welcome. > > Matthias > "statically linking wxGTK2 2.6.1 into aMule" may be the better solution. No more dependancies problems and the packages shouldn't be too heavy ... You may also provide 2 versions, "static" and "dynamic" but this may be too much (absurd) work Amael