Re: Completely frustrated by Trac on FC4

Myroslav Opyr <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.freshrpms.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

I'm not too comfortable with the way I'd have to rebuild clearsilver
package. I installed trac-0.9 from sources last week as there is no
trac-0.9rpm yet.

So I faced similar problems, Doug Stewart is mentioning about. Is that an
option to have variant of clearsilver package with python bindings packaged?
Or to have clearsilver python bindings available as separate package?

I'm unsure about policies, so sorry If I provided too wild guesses.

Regards,

m.

On 11/14/05, Doug Stewart <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Dag Wieers wrote:
> > [snip]
> >
> > I don't know why the python-clearsilver packages are not there for FC4,
> > but the buildlogs are available, the SPEC files are at your disposal and
> > we're ready to help you put the pieces together.
>
> [snip]
> As to the solutions, perhaps the breaking out of the python-clearsilver
> bindings from the actual clearsilver package is unnecessary, at least if
> Axel's packages are any indicator.
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.