Re: Completely frustrated by Trac on FC4
Myroslav Opyr <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.freshrpms.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, I'm not too comfortable with the way I'd have to rebuild clearsilver package. I installed trac-0.9 from sources last week as there is no trac-0.9rpm yet. So I faced similar problems, Doug Stewart is mentioning about. Is that an option to have variant of clearsilver package with python bindings packaged? Or to have clearsilver python bindings available as separate package? I'm unsure about policies, so sorry If I provided too wild guesses. Regards, m. On 11/14/05, Doug Stewart <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dag Wieers wrote: > > [snip] > > > > I don't know why the python-clearsilver packages are not there for FC4, > > but the buildlogs are available, the SPEC files are at your disposal and > > we're ready to help you put the pieces together. > > [snip] > As to the solutions, perhaps the breaking out of the python-clearsilver > bindings from the actual clearsilver package is unnecessary, at least if > Axel's packages are any indicator. >