Re: Completely frustrated by Trac on FC4

Dag Wieers <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.freshrpms.user
Organization 3TI Web Hosting Services
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, 15 Nov 2005, Myroslav Opyr wrote:

> I'm not too comfortable with the way I'd have to rebuild clearsilver
> package. I installed trac-0.9 from sources last week as there is no
> trac-0.9rpm yet.
> 
> So I faced similar problems, Doug Stewart is mentioning about. Is that an
> option to have variant of clearsilver package with python bindings packaged?
> Or to have clearsilver python bindings available as separate package?
> 
> I'm unsure about policies, so sorry If I provided too wild guesses.

I still don't know what the problem is. Are the python-clearsilver 
packages missing ? Then please look into why they are. Just moving the 
python bindings inside the clearsilver package will not fix the reason why 
they are missing in the first place.

The issue is niet that they are in a seperate package, the issue is that 
they seem to be missing. Please investigate and fix, I have no time and 
Dries is doing FC4.

If you want a quick solution, do your homework, otherwise wait until 
someone has time to do your homework for you.

I'm not ranting here :) Just giving basic facts.

Kind regards,
--   dag wieers,  [email protected],  http://dag.wieers.com/   --
[all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.