Re: Fedora Core development freshrpms packages

Matthias Saou <thias@spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.egg.and.spam.freshrpms.net>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.freshrpms.user,gmane.spam.detected
Message-ID <20060130171215.7175d33b@python2>
Dag Wieers wrote :

> > > Dries and my xine packages are both ok, so you might want to compare the 
> > > buildlogs.
> > 
> > For Fedora Core development, I really doubt it, or else it's because
> > you've got many libX*-devel packages installed by default on your build
> > system :-)
> > 
> > Anyway, fixed FC development xine packages are available now!
> 
> Hmm, looking at the disttag I thought it was about FC4. Since it was 
> related to the new xorg packaging, only FC5 was affected. Not sure what 
> the report was about then ?

Since those are not yet packages rebuilt against the final FC5, I didn't
want to use "fc5" in the disttag, since I would have had to bump the
release of all the packages otherwise (and I know you would have hated
that ;-)), so I've used "fc4.1" instead, and will trigger a rebuild with
"fc5" against final FC5 when it's ready :-)

Matthias

-- 
Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/
Fedora Core release 4 (Stentz) - Linux kernel 2.6.14-1.1656_FC4
Load : 0.16 0.30 0.36
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.