Re: A few more recent ooopses on FC1

On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, Seweryn Walentynowicz wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 10:23:47AM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
> > > > rpm -ivh rar-3.6.0-0.1.beta2.rf.i386.rpm
> > > > error: Failed dependencies:
> > > >        libstdc++.so.6 is needed by rar-3.6.0-0.1.beta2.rf
> > > >        libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4) is needed by rar-3.6.0-0.1.beta2.rf
> > 
> > Are you using Fedora Legacy ? Since Fedora is out of support, we build 
> > agains Fedora Legacy, and I guess you should be using it as well for your 
> > own sake :)
> 
>    I'm using a few machines with RH-7.3 and FC1 with rpmforge packages 
> ( thank's a lot ! ). All this servers has complete fedora-legacy updates. 
> Rar binaries had a problem with dynamically linked version on RH-7.x
> since version 3.5. I patched src.rpm myself changed to static binary
> and rebuild. This old version of original rpmforge packages runs on Fedora 
> machines correctly.
>  At now, 3.6 version doesn't work on Fedora Core 1 too. I think, would
> be fine, if you put some %if phrase to specfile to use static binaries
> for dist = {rhx,fc1}. I don't have any machines with FC 2, so I don't
> know nothing about rpmforge rar packages for this distributions.

Ok. I understand now. Rar is not compiled, but binary-only.
I have made the fix and new packages will be available soon.

Thanks for the feedback !
--   dag wieers,  [email protected],  http://dag.wieers.com/   --
[all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power]