Re: Latest build oops

On Jun 7, 2006, at 12:00 AM, [email protected] wrote:

> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 13:15:27 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Dag Wieers <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Latest build oops. (Dries Verachtert)
> To: "General freshrpms.net discussion list"
> 	<[email protected]>
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
>
> On Tue, 6 Jun 2006, Dag Wieers wrote:
>
>> Maybe it's better to build against subversion directly instead of  
>> using
>> older SRPMs ?

While doing so would certainly address my issue, it doesn't resolve
the issue-behind-the-issue, which is that the rpmforge source rpm
for that package doesn't build on FC1-type systems.

> The change was made on 12 october 2005. Before the FC5 release bump.
> However I made my packages on 9 march 2005 without needing the change.
>
> So I'm not sure why in your case perl created the .packlist and in  
> my case
> it didn't. (for none of the distributions I package)

[snip]

> Maybe perl was updated in between ?
>
> [root@lisse dar]# dar-exec -d fc3a rpm -qi perl
> = Executing "rpm -qi perl" for fc3a.
> Name        : perl                         Relocations: (not  
> relocatable)
> Version     : 5.8.5                             Vendor: Red Hat, Inc.
> Release     : 24.FC3                        Build Date: Fri 16 Dec  
> 2005 08:59:51 PM CET
> Install Date: Thu 05 Jan 2006 05:58:41 PM CET      Build Host:  
> dolly.build.redhat.com
> Group       : Development/Languages         Source RPM:  
> perl-5.8.5-24.FC3.src.rpm

[snip]

> And indeed, the perl is not really the same. It could also be  
> related to
> one of the perl modules used by Makefile.PL

~ > rpm -q perl
perl-5.8.3-17.5.legacy

Could be, but it's not something I'm motivated in tracking down.  I'm
simply reporting what I find in the hopes that
1) A fix gets rolled into the rpmforge releases, or

2) If not, there will be a report in the list archives that anyone  
running
into the same problems can find.

-dean takemori