Re: Latest build oops
Dean Takemori <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.freshrpms.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Jun 9, 2006, at 12:00 AM, [email protected] wrote: > Message: 5 > Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 11:28:05 +0200 (CEST) > From: Dag Wieers <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Latest build oops > To: "General freshrpms.net discussion list" > <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII [snip] > There are other cases where we make changes to SPEC files that do not > change the resulting binary package. Those modifications are being > done > only on the SPEC file in subversion and will only affect newer binary > builds (either for a new distribution or for a new release). [snip] >> 2) If not, there will be a report in the list archives that anyone >> running >> into the same problems can find. > > That's fine. This is perfectly acceptable as far as I'm concerned. A fix eventually gets rolled in, and there's both a report of the bug in the list archives and a note of the .spec fix in subversion. (Plus a semiformal clarification of the release criteria) -dean takemori