Re: Kernel module packages, the dkms approach
"Justin Conover" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.freshrpms.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 10/10/06, Justin Conover <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 10/9/06, Matthias Saou <thias@spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.egg.and.spam.freshrpms.net > > wrote: > > > > Matthias Saou wrote : > > > > [...] > > > Feel free to let the list know what you think about this approach. Any > > > > > bug reports, fixes, enhancements or comments regarding this package > > are > > > also very welcome. > > > > > > I'm already thinking of doing a dkms aware package of the lirc kernel > > > module I use on my living room computer, as well as a madwifi one, as > > > tracking Rawhide updates and keeping the remote and the network > > working > > > is a waste of time! > > > > No on-list feedback, so I don't really know what to think... :-) > > > > Still, here's what I've done : > > > > - Finished polishing the nvidia-x11-drv package, it only needs to be > > fixed to disable the dri and GLcore X modules on FC6, works for FC5. > > > > - Packaged "madwifi", which contains all the tools + the dkms-enabled > > kernel modules sources. I'm still having an issue with this one : After > > switching from a source-based install to the package, the wlan_tkip > > module doesn't get loaded automatically, so NetworkManager isn't able > > to connect to WPA protected networks. Ugly workaround : modprobe > > wlan_tkip from rc.local. Any insight on this one would be most welcome. > > > > - Packaged "dkms-tiacx", which is the first trivial dkms-enabled package > > > > since it doesn't contain any tools, just some noarch kernel modules > > sources. I've only tested the build, since I don't currently have > > access to any acx100 hardware, but modprobing the module works. > > > > I'll start a thread on the fedora-packaging list about a possible > > naming convention for the dkms-enabled kernel modules packages (other > > distros seem to just be doing "dkms-<modulename>"), and hopefully also > > get some feedback about what people think of them. As both as a packager > > > > and an end user, I really like them since they "just work". > > > > Matthias > > > > -- > > Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/ > > Fedora Core release 5.92 (FC6 Test3) - Linux kernel 2.6.18-1.2726.fc6 > > Load : 0.20 0.24 0.25 > > > > > Looks good, I'll try and test it this week. > > How about the nvidia *beta* driver 9625 in a testing repo or something? > > ATI driver too? > > Thank you, > ati x64 https://support.ati.com/ics/support/KBAnswer.asp?questionID=1647 ati x86 https://support.ati.com/ics/support/KBAnswer.asp?questionID=1643 nvidia beta http://www.nzone.com/object/nzone_downloads_rel70betadriver.html