Re: Kernel module packages, the dkms approach

"Justin Conover" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.freshrpms.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 10/10/06, Justin Conover <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/9/06, Matthias Saou <thias@spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.egg.and.spam.freshrpms.net
> > wrote:
> >
> > Matthias Saou wrote :
> >
> > [...]
> > > Feel free to let the list know what you think about this approach. Any
> >
> > > bug reports, fixes, enhancements or comments regarding this package
> > are
> > > also very welcome.
> > >
> > > I'm already thinking of doing a dkms aware package of the lirc kernel
> > > module I use on my living room computer, as well as a madwifi one, as
> > > tracking Rawhide updates and keeping the remote and the network
> > working
> > > is a waste of time!
> >
> > No on-list feedback, so I don't really know what to think... :-)
> >
> > Still, here's what I've done :
> >
> > - Finished polishing the nvidia-x11-drv package, it only needs to be
> > fixed to disable the dri and GLcore X modules on FC6, works for FC5.
> >
> > - Packaged "madwifi", which contains all the tools + the dkms-enabled
> > kernel modules sources. I'm still having an issue with this one : After
> > switching from a source-based install to the package, the wlan_tkip
> > module doesn't get loaded automatically, so NetworkManager isn't able
> > to connect to WPA protected networks. Ugly workaround : modprobe
> > wlan_tkip from rc.local. Any insight on this one would be most welcome.
> >
> > - Packaged "dkms-tiacx", which is the first trivial dkms-enabled package
> >
> > since it doesn't contain any tools, just some noarch kernel modules
> > sources. I've only tested the build, since I don't currently have
> > access to any acx100 hardware, but modprobing the module works.
> >
> > I'll start a thread on the fedora-packaging list about a possible
> > naming convention for the dkms-enabled kernel modules packages (other
> > distros seem to just be doing "dkms-<modulename>"), and hopefully also
> > get some feedback about what people think of them. As both as a packager
> >
> > and an end user, I really like them since they "just work".
> >
> > Matthias
> >
> > --
> > Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/
> > Fedora Core release 5.92 (FC6 Test3) - Linux kernel 2.6.18-1.2726.fc6
> > Load : 0.20 0.24 0.25
> >
>
>
> Looks good, I'll try and test it this week.
>
> How about the nvidia *beta* driver 9625 in a testing repo or something?
>
> ATI driver too?
>
> Thank you,
>

ati x64
https://support.ati.com/ics/support/KBAnswer.asp?questionID=1647

ati x86
https://support.ati.com/ics/support/KBAnswer.asp?questionID=1643

nvidia beta
http://www.nzone.com/object/nzone_downloads_rel70betadriver.html
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.