Re: xmame status?

Andre Robatino <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.freshrpms.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Matthias Saou wrote:
> Alex Jackson wrote :
>
>   
>>> Xmame (and xmess) haven't been updated since 0.106, but now there is a new 
>>> port of Mame, sdlmame, at version 0.109.  Is xmame deprecated?  And what 
>>> about xmess?
>>>       
>> The short answer is "yes".  xmame/xmess are probably permanently dead as of 
>> 0.106; the active multiplatform MAME/MESS port for the forseeable future 
>> will be the SDL port.
>>     
>
> Yeah, unfortunately it seems to be like that. The long answer is that
> some major core changes in 0.107 would require a lot of work to be done
> to xmame... too much it seems. sdlmame is a much simpler port of the
> main xmame, since it doesn't try to focus on many UNIX specific
> features and simply uses SDL to do everything. The big loss here is
> that currently sdlmame can only display with either OpenGL or software
> rendering AFAIK, whereas xmame had an Xv overlay mode that was really
> fast even with no accelerated OpenGL available (think recent ATI and
> NVIDIA cards with the free drivers).
>
> As you can see, I've kept xmame 0.106 for FC6, but also started
> packaging sdlmame in parallel. If sdlmame works with Xv some day, and
> with at least one frontend (updating gxmame for it would be nice), then
> I might drop the xmame package, but that won't happen overnight.
>
> Matthias
>
>   
  I installed and tried to run sdlmame.  It almost immediately exited 
due to it expecting to find roms and other files in a different, 
version-specific location (/usr/share/doc/sdlmame-0.109/dirs, 
apparently).  My mouse froze, though I was able to use the keyboard to 
log out and back in, at which point it worked again.  It would be better 
to use a version-independent directory.  Also, is there going to be an 
sdlmess to replace xmess?
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.