Re: Kernel module packages, the dkms approach

Andre Costa <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.freshrpms.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Matthias,

On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 19:06:48 +0200
Matthias Saou
<thias@spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.egg.and.spam.freshrpms.net>
wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> For the very few kernel module packages I've released over the past
> years, I've gotten quickly tired of having to rebuild a whole bunch of
> binary rpms each time an updated kernel was released.
> 
> I've been wanting to try dkms for a while, since it has an approach of
> kernel module packaging that makes a packager's life much simpler, and
> an impatient end user's life easier too, as it recompiles kernel
> modules automatically (at boot time usually, can be before for initrd
> required modules, but it can usually be kept quite simple).
[...]
> Feel free to let the list know what you think about this approach. Any
> bug reports, fixes, enhancements or comments regarding this package
> are also very welcome.

I don't know how this voodoo works, but, hell, it works =) I just
upgraded kernel to 2.6.18-1.2200, did good old 'sudo smart install
nvidia-x11-drv' and... there it was, it just worked =)

So, thks a lot for making our life (a lot) easier with regards to nvidia
driver upgrades =)

Regards,

Andre

-- 
Andre Oliveira da Costa
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.