Re: Kernel module packages, the dkms approach
Andre Costa <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.freshrpms.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Matthias, On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 19:06:48 +0200 Matthias Saou <thias@spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.egg.and.spam.freshrpms.net> wrote: > Hi, > > For the very few kernel module packages I've released over the past > years, I've gotten quickly tired of having to rebuild a whole bunch of > binary rpms each time an updated kernel was released. > > I've been wanting to try dkms for a while, since it has an approach of > kernel module packaging that makes a packager's life much simpler, and > an impatient end user's life easier too, as it recompiles kernel > modules automatically (at boot time usually, can be before for initrd > required modules, but it can usually be kept quite simple). [...] > Feel free to let the list know what you think about this approach. Any > bug reports, fixes, enhancements or comments regarding this package > are also very welcome. I don't know how this voodoo works, but, hell, it works =) I just upgraded kernel to 2.6.18-1.2200, did good old 'sudo smart install nvidia-x11-drv' and... there it was, it just worked =) So, thks a lot for making our life (a lot) easier with regards to nvidia driver upgrades =) Regards, Andre -- Andre Oliveira da Costa