Re: libgpod and FC6

Andre Robatino wrote :

>   There is a libgpod package in the Freshrpms FC6 repo, and also in FC6 
> core.  The Freshrpms version is newer and so causes an attempted 
> update.  The Freshrpms FC6 packages should be audited to make sure there 
> are no other conflicts before the FC6 updates repo goes live on Tuesday.

What "conflicts"? This is on purpose, as the latest gtkpod requires a
newer libgpod than the one shipped in Core. If/when the Core package
gets updated, then I'll remove the libgpod package from freshrpms.

I don't usually replace any Core or Extras packages, but as libgpod is
closely tied to gtkpod (they used to be the same source), the update
was required. I've set the release to 0 on purpose to let an eventual
Core update package of the same version replace it, I double checked
that there were no functional differences between the Core and
freshrpms packages, made sure the soname didn't change, and tested my
package against rhythmbox (which uses to lib).

Matthias

-- 
Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/
Fedora Core release 5.92 (FC6 Test3) - Linux kernel 2.6.18-1.2798.fc6
Load : 0.00 0.04 0.02