Re: Firmware packages for Intel & redistribution

Axel Thimm <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.freshrpms.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 06:58:27PM -0300, jeff wrote:
> Axel Thimm wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 10:28:19AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >>On Mon, 16 Oct 2006, Troy Engel wrote:
> >>>>I don't know about ipw3495, but with ipw2200 you can't get the firmware 
> >>>>in an RPM package, you have to agree to the license and download it 
> >>>>from 
> >>>Incorrect. ATrpms offers a ready-to-use ipw2200 firmware RPM, I use it 
> >>>myself on my Thinkpad at home.
> >>Did you agree to the license conditions at 
> >>[http://ipw2200.sourceforge.net/firmware.php?fid=7]? If not, then ATrpms 
> >>is violating the firmware license.
> >
> >I was pointed to ATrpms potentially violating the law :)
> 
> Isn't Intel violating SF's terms of service with the license on that page?

No, I don't think so, but the usual IANAL stuff applies. The (closed)
firmware isn't placed on the sf.net resources only linked to it.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFS+SZQBVS1GOamfERAuhCAJ4qxIgDRnLeKmk39DZYr2tqpHqW6gCeJf8n
xEFsHJS54r3fWqVBGY3cCHs=
=tDzp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.