Re: freshrpms packages w/o repoid?

On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 05:25:34PM +0100, Matthias Saou wrote:
> Axel Thimm wrote :
> 
> > I've had a couple of bug reports by now that would claim that ATrpms
> > has overlapping packages with Fedora Core and the examples given were
> > faac, faad, perhaps even ffmpeg IIRC.
> > 
> > Of course such packages don't exist in official repos (unless US law
> > was changed and I didn't notice ;), and it turns out that these
> > packages are freshrpm ones, but are missing any "fr" or "rf" tags.
> > 
> > Is this on purpose or did the buildsystem mess this up? If it's
> > intentional, may I ask why? It creates lots of confusion.
> 
> I've dropped the "fr" tag quite a long time ago, and believe it or not,
> I have less complaints (like yours) about having introduced confusion

That's probably because all users think now that these packages are
more official. Less is obviously more in this context. Still it
bounces now to all other non-freshrpms repos.

> than I used to have about "why do you package only in french?" ;-)

lol
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFonNdQBVS1GOamfERAi+PAJ4lQawSnp8Vh5EUaeKI/AuVcQCNXgCggDwB
wNTwguN8By+agnCxdAciidw=
=9IRH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----