Re: rpmfusion

+1 dkms rules :) the main reason I switched to freshrpms from livna.


2007/10/2, Dario Castellarin <[email protected]>:
>
>  Which approach will be chosen for kernel modules? Freshrpm's dkms,
> Livna's kmod or maybe both with opportune Obsoletes? As I really enjoy the
> dkms "snappiness" and I wouldn't really like to see it disappear...
>
> Dario
>
> Matthias Saou ha scritto:
>
> Ismael Olea wrote :
>
>    This means rpmforge is dead? :-m
>
> It's the first time I've read about rpmfusion .
>
>  No! But it does mean freshrpms as we know it is going to ultimately be
> "put down", though :-)
>
> But Dag, Dries and others are going to continue what is currently
> rpmforge.net as rpmrepo.org. So basically, for a _really_ quick summary
> of the current repository changes :
>
> - freshrpms merges with rpm.livna.org and dribble as rpmfusion
>   -> Packages for Fedora and for EL with EPEL
> - rpmforge merges (I think) with CentOS Extras as rpmrepo
>   -> Packages for Fedora and for EL without EPEL
> - atrpms stays the same
>   -> Packages for Fedora and for EL without EPEL (I think)
>
> (I hope I didn't get anything wrong here :-D)
>
> Matthias
>
>


-- 
Μπομπ ο Μάστορας.