Re: rpmfusion
Dag Wieers <[email protected]> Tue, 9 Oct 2007 14:34:12 +0200 (CEST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.freshrpms.user |
|---|---|
| Organization | DAGIT Linux Solutions |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, Matthias Saou wrote: > Ismael Olea wrote : > > > This means rpmforge is dead? :-m > > > > It's the first time I've read about rpmfusion . > > No! But it does mean freshrpms as we know it is going to ultimately be > "put down", though :-) > > But Dag, Dries and others are going to continue what is currently > rpmforge.net as rpmrepo.org. So basically, for a _really_ quick summary > of the current repository changes : > > - freshrpms merges with rpm.livna.org and dribble as rpmfusion > -> Packages for Fedora and for EL with EPEL > - rpmforge merges (I think) with CentOS Extras as rpmrepo > -> Packages for Fedora and for EL without EPEL > - atrpms stays the same > -> Packages for Fedora and for EL without EPEL (I think) > > (I hope I didn't get anything wrong here :-D) atrpms has joined rpmrepo as well, together with some other known repositories, mostly Enterprise Linux but also Fedora. One of the reasons that Fedora is being followed is to prepare the repository for the next RHEL/CentOS. So (the latest) Fedora stays fairly important. So we will end up with either CentOS Extras+RPMforge+atrpms or Fedora(EPEL)+rpmfusion. -- -- dag wieers, [email protected], http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]