GWN email formatting
Tristan <kesuari-/[email protected]> Mon, 10 Feb 2003 14:10:14 +1100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.gentoo.admin |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
The email edition of the Gentoo Weekly Newsletter (GWN) posts web and email address as footnotes after the paragraph they occur in, which often means that four or more extremely similar addresses may be listed one after another with only a number to distinguish them, e.g. > 18. http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=31562 > 19. http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=33841 > 20. http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=33745 > 21. http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=34174 It is not at all clear what these are, other than threads in the Gentoo forums <http://forums.gentoo.org/>. When reading, it is possible to totally ignore the footnote references and not realise there is an webpage associated with what's being discussed, or to forget it by the time you reach the footnotes, and have to have your thought process upset. Apparently, this has its origins in the Debian Weekely Newsletter (DWN), which does things similarly. No doubt, they, in turn, pulled it from the tradition of publishing a bibliography in books and referencing them by numbers, often with a smaller references as a footnote.. Being a paged medium, footnotes always stand out in books, but are ill-suited to emails, where the footnote will not necessarily be visible until after the entire paragraph's been read. However, every medium has its own way of publishing links to webpages and the like: HTML shows them as hyperlinks, for example. In most media where hypelinks aren't possible, especially in email, the tradition is to include them inline surrounded by angle brackets, as with my URL above. Is there any particular reason why the GWN does this, other than because that's what the DWN does? Would it be possible to have it changed to the clearer, more conventional method? Tristan McLeay. -- [email protected] mailing list