Re: How to satisfy Portage dependencies with dummy packages (or other methods)?

Georgi Georgiev wrote:

 > This, I think, is the *proper* way to work around what I consider
 > to be a portage bug.

I'm sorry, but I am too new to the concepts behind Portage to fully
understand your answer to my question. If it was an answer, that is;
I'm not sure about that. ;-)

-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Sincerely
Dipl. Inform. Ralph Seichter

-- 
[email protected] mailing list