Re: [gentoo-ia64] non-PIC code in shared libraries
Aron Griffis <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.gentoo.alpha |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20031210211152.GC10626@time> |
Jon Portnoy wrote: [Wed Dec 10 2003, 04:08:51PM EST]
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 03:59:46PM -0500, Aron Griffis wrote:
> > Jon Portnoy wrote: [Wed Dec 10 2003, 12:47:15PM EST]
> > > AMD64 has the same issue. A number of applications have been patched to
> > > build properly (using -fPIC for libs). For example, look at the ncurses
> > > ebuild:
> > >
> > > # Shared objects are compiled properly with -fPIC, but
> > > # standard libs also require this.
> > > if [ "${ARCH}" = "amd64" ]
> > > then
> > > append-flags -fPIC
> > > fi
> >
> > Clearly we need a generic check for 64-bit. There are ebuilds
> > throughout the tree that add -fPIC for some mix of amd64, alpha or ia64.
> > Do we have something already that would suffice?
> >
>
> A good idea, but I don't think we have anything currently.
>
> > Probably the best would be to abstract this into portage so that the
> > implementation could change as needed. Ideas?
>
> Ideally we could come up with a good way to check in an eclass and just
> call that eclass in ebuilds that need it.
That would probably be best (at least for the near-term) since it would
work instantly on all versions of portage out there.
I'll write up the eclass and commit it.
--
Aron Griffis
Gentoo Linux Developer (alpha / ia64 / ruby / vim)
Key fingerprint = E3B6 8734 C2D6 B5E5 AE76 FB3A 26B1 C5E3 2010 4EB0
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/14wYJrHF4yAQTrARAuU9AKCzLHhsetW6wYi7xHh1iZzgBSdougCgy0c/ WIigtwx0LhHtZPeL2fw3iAY= =lo2q -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----