Re: vanilla-sources vs alpha-sources
Marc Giger <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.gentoo.alpha |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 15:03:43 -0500 "Donsbach, Jeff" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Marc, > > Help a newbie. ;-) What would be the difference between your 2.4.25 Hehe:-) Ok, I will help you if you help me. I saw your e-mail address and it seems you are working at hp. The source for alpha's! I need more alphas!:-)) EV67 or newer would be cool. So you send me a board and a processor (or even better dual) and I will answer your question*BIG SMILE > ebuild and the current vanilla sources? I've been running a "vanilla > source" kernel for a few days and it seems fine to me (in my limited > use so far). No kidding! If you are happy with vanilla-source I think you won't profit from alpha-sources. But it will contain almost the same thing as alpha-sources 2.4.21: - xfs (useless with 2.4.25) - grsecurity - usagi - cryptoloop-jari - superfreeswan - uac_sysctl - forgot something? Where usagi and superfreeswan are exclusive Additionally I will add acl's (ea+acl+nfsacl) to the tree, because I think it's also a very useful security feature. greets Marc loves his alpha Giger -- [email protected] mailing list