Re: alpha-sources: obsolete in a 2.6 world?
Aron Griffis <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.gentoo.alpha |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Jay Maynard wrote: [Tue Mar 16 2004, 09:16:58PM EST] > Finally, there's one fix to a multiline literal in an Alpha-specific > assembler header file, referenced in bug 38354. It appears to have been > fixed in 2.6.4. Unfortunately 2.6.4 is broken on alpha due to changes made by the linux-ia64 team (kernel.org, not Gentoo). 2.6.3 works well, though. Hopefully 2.6.5 will be fixed up (but I don't think so yet). > I'd like to see the gentoo-sources kernel become the default for Alpha, but > I also don't want to disenfranchise anyone who's using the features the > alpha-sources 2.4.21 kernel has. The sysctl_uac patch can now be applied > only during a build for Alpha, via a feature added to the kernel-2 eclass. > The others aren't Alpha specific, so they can either be included or left out > independdently of the architecture being installed. Cool :-) > Do we have a feel for how many folks out there are using the full > grsecurity, or the complete SuperFreeS/WAN, or USAGI? Is it something we > should push to have included in the Gentoo kernel by default? Doesn't matter to me. Personally I'd like to see Gentoo/Alpha move to 2.6.x for 2004.1, but I suppose that would be pushing too quickly. Maybe it would be possible for 2004.2. Regards, Aron -- Aron Griffis Gentoo Linux Developer (alpha / ia64 / mozilla / mutt / ruby / vim) Key fingerprint = E3B6 8734 C2D6 B5E5 AE76 FB3A 26B1 C5E3 2010 4EB0
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAbYIZJrHF4yAQTrARApSwAJ4tIyUJs/6wf6/7e9EMluZIY5dYFACgoLCo PwKgQq1wP9j61BEZMpwKZJg= =aAKs -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----