(fwd) Re: [gentoo-alpha] Useable Stage1 for Alpah
Jonathan Kelly <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.gentoo.alpha |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 05 May 2004 11:51:05 +1000, Jonathan Kelly <[email protected]> wrote: Ah, I just found the stages in the experimental directory, and they seem to work. Currently running a build using stage1-alpha-20040314.tar.bz2 I'll let you know if it works. Perhaps someone should consider removine the 1.4-r1 stage as it is just a dead end. And perhaps something pointing people to experimental. Cheers. Jonathan. On Tue, 4 May 2004 08:17:00 -0400 , you wrote: >Oh, it's active. It just slept late for the quarterly release. > >A strategy might be to start with an older release for installation and sync >up to current afterwards. That may require extra compilation steps, though. > >I was going tell you to read the archives, but I don't know if this list has >any. > >-----Original Message----- >From: Jonathan Kelly [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 10:32 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: [gentoo-alpha] Useable Stage1 for Alpah > > >Hi there, > >I've been trying to resurrect some alpha boxen I have, and discover >that the current gentoo stage1 doesn't work. It seems that portage >changes under the bootstrap script and makes it barf, as well as an >error message about SLOTMOVE confusing some things. I posted a message >in the forums under Alternate Architectures. > >Luckily I had one box that was still running gentoo so I've updated >that, after much mucking about. So now, I'd like to build a useable >stage1, so started to look at catalyst, but it seems to be have a >circular dependency like having a stage3 to start from, but I don't >have a stage3 ... huh? > >If i tared up my complete working system and called that a stage3, >would that work ... or anyone in the know who can give me pointers >about getting a useable stage1. > >Also, gentoo-alpha seems to have dropped off ... is it still active >... judging from the state of no useable stage1, it looks not ... or >is there some reason for this and people are working to rectify the >situation. I'm happy to help. > >Cheers, >Jonathan. -- [email protected] mailing list