(fwd) Re: [gentoo-alpha] Useable Stage1 for Alpah

Jonathan Kelly <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.gentoo.alpha
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, 05 May 2004 11:51:05 +1000, Jonathan Kelly
<[email protected]> wrote:

Ah,

I just found the stages in the experimental directory, and they seem
to work. Currently running a build using stage1-alpha-20040314.tar.bz2

I'll let you know if it works.  Perhaps someone should consider
removine the 1.4-r1 stage as it is just a dead end. And perhaps
something pointing people to experimental.

Cheers.
Jonathan.

On Tue, 4 May 2004 08:17:00 -0400 , you wrote:

>Oh, it's active. It just slept late for the quarterly release. 
>
>A strategy might be to start with an older release for installation and sync
>up to current afterwards. That may require extra compilation steps, though.
>
>I was going tell you to read the archives, but I don't know if this list has
>any. 
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jonathan Kelly [mailto:[email protected]]
>Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 10:32 PM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: [gentoo-alpha] Useable Stage1 for Alpah
>
>
>Hi there,
>
>I've been trying to resurrect some alpha boxen I have, and discover
>that the current gentoo stage1 doesn't work. It seems that portage
>changes under the bootstrap script and makes it barf, as well as an
>error message about SLOTMOVE confusing some things. I posted a message
>in the forums under Alternate Architectures.
>
>Luckily I had one box that was still running gentoo so I've updated
>that, after much mucking about. So now, I'd like to build a useable
>stage1, so started to look at catalyst, but it seems to be have a
>circular dependency like having a stage3 to start from, but I don't
>have a stage3 ... huh?
>
>If i tared up my complete working system and called that a stage3,
>would that work ... or anyone in the know who can give me pointers
>about getting a useable stage1.
>
>Also, gentoo-alpha seems to have dropped off ... is it still active
>... judging from the state of no useable stage1, it looks not ... or
>is there some reason for this and people are working to rectify the
>situation. I'm happy to help.
>
>Cheers,
>Jonathan.


--
[email protected] mailing list
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.