Re: alpha performance
"Brian Parkhurst" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.gentoo.alpha |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <001401c5065b$0d2a8c50$3301a8c0@ICHIRO> |
I've been running my Alpha Server 800 - 500Mhz ev56 for a little over a year on the Gentoo 1.4 rc1 liveCD. I'm up to the linux-2.6.10-rc1 kernel. (yeah they fixed the OEM DAC960 problem natively and the io/ref problem) I agree that I've not successfully managed to get X running locally on the host. (Tried a variety of video cards). I also have an annoyance with the qlogic 1020 ISP drivers. I've tried both the "known" broken qlogicisp module and the qla1280 driver with the st modules. For some reason after a couple of days the tape devices become unavailable to the system. Also, attempting to unload the kernel module fails and hangs the session on which the rmmod was attempted. Jan 15 11:53:06 alpha-omega scsi(0:0): Resetting SCSI BUS Jan 15 11:53:06 alpha-omega scsi0 : QLogic QLA1040 PCI to SCSI Host Adapter Jan 15 11:53:06 alpha-omega Firmware version: 7.65.00, Driver version 3.25 Jan 15 11:53:06 alpha-omega Vendor: SONY Model: SDT-9000 Rev: 0123 Jan 15 11:53:06 alpha-omega Type: Sequential-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02 Jan 15 11:53:06 alpha-omega scsi(0:0:0:0): Sync: period 10, offset 12 Jan 15 11:53:06 alpha-omega Attached scsi tape st0 at scsi0, channel 0, id 0, lun 0 Jan 15 11:53:06 alpha-omega st0: try direct i/o: yes (alignment 512 B), max page reachable by HBA 196582 Jan 15 11:53:06 alpha-omega Vendor: IBM Model: DCHS09F CLAR09 Rev: 5353 Jan 15 11:53:06 alpha-omega Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02 Jan 15 11:53:06 alpha-omega scsi(0:0:2:0): Sync: period 10, offset 12, Tagged queuing: depth 255 Jan 15 11:53:06 alpha-omega SCSI device sda: 17796078 512-byte hdwr sectors (9112 MB) Jan 15 11:53:06 alpha-omega sda: asking for cache data failed Jan 15 11:53:06 alpha-omega sda: assuming drive cache: write through Jan 15 11:53:06 alpha-omega SCSI device sda: 17796078 512-byte hdwr sectors (9112 MB) Jan 15 11:53:06 alpha-omega SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back Jan 15 11:53:06 alpha-omega /dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target2/lun0: p1 p4 p5 Jan 15 11:53:06 alpha-omega Attached scsi disk sda at scsi0, channel 0, id 2, lun 0 Jan 15 11:53:06 alpha-omega qla1280: QLA1040 found on PCI bus 0, dev 12 Jan 15 11:53:06 alpha-omega scsi(1:0): Resetting SCSI BUS Jan 15 11:53:06 alpha-omega scsi1 : QLogic QLA1040 PCI to SCSI Host Adapter Jan 15 11:53:06 alpha-omega Firmware version: 7.65.00, Driver version 3.25 Jan 15 11:53:06 alpha-omega Vendor: Quantum Model: DLT4000 Rev: CD50 Jan 15 11:53:06 alpha-omega Type: Sequential-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02 Brian Parkhurst www.pyrobrian.com brianp-at-spamcop-dot-net ----- Original Message ----- From: <[email protected]> To: "Gabriel M. Beddingfield" <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2005 3:32 AM Subject: Re: [gentoo-alpha] alpha performance > <snip> > > > > 3. Installing gentoo -- I had to use an old liveCD (like gentoo 1.4 or > > something). If 2004.3 (or whatever's the latest) doesn't boot for you, try > > it. There's also a "jumpstart" disc out there somewhere. It's geared toward > > installing RedHat/SuSe... but if you run into trouble it will be handy in > > diagnosing your problem. If you get *any* gentoo disc booted, still go ahead > > and use a current stage/portage tarball. However, you'll have to work around > > a few missing commands that are in the current Handbook. (E.g. mirrorselect > > will be gone, you'll have to select mirrors by hand.) > > > I'm a bit curious about this.. :) I know 2004.3 was foobared but any > boot problems should have been fixed with the 2004.3-r1 livecd that was > available shortly after the original 2004.3 release. > > If there's any other problems I'd appreciate you filing a bug at > http://bugs.gentoo.org so I can fix it in future livecds. > > > 6. 2.4 kernels are still recommended. > We're moving to 2.6 kernels which works beautifully on most systems - a > few systems still seems to have problems with 2.6 kernels. The 2005.0 > livecd will have both 2.6 and 2.4 kernels for this reason. > > Regards, > Bryan Ã~stergaard > Gentoo/Alpha release coordinator > > -- > [email protected] mailing list > > -- [email protected] mailing list