Re: Some experiences upgrading my kernel from 2.4.28 to 2.6.11.8
"Bryan Oestergaard" <[email protected]> Sat, 28 May 2005 18:25:41 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.gentoo.alpha |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 04:19:02PM +0200, Andrew Gaylard wrote: > Aron Griffis wrote: > >Andrew Gaylard wrote: [Fri May 27 2005, 03:49:09PM EDT] > >>I did the "emerge -ua world" to bring my whole system up to date. > >>sendmail-8.13.3 and strace-4.5.11 wouldn't build. Anyone seen this? > > > > > >Please file bugs for these... http://bugs.gentoo.org/ > > OK, done. The sendmail bug is bug 94287. > The strace problem's gone away -- I must have tried an older version. > Nope, we fixed that bug :) <snip> > > > >Interesting! For me "generic" doesn't work, but "dp264" does (on > >a ds20e). I guess this is sort of like the tulip driver: if it > >doesn't work, try the other one. > > Here's a question: will my kernel be slower if it isn't built for > the exact machine type? In other words, what exactly does the > "system type" affect? > Possibly, yes. According to the help in menuconfig the Generic system type makes the kernel slower and larger. Not sure how big (if any) a impact it'll have. Regards, Bryan Østergaard -- [email protected] mailing list