Re: Re: Systemd migration: opinion and questions
Marc Joliet <[email protected]> Sat, 23 May 2015 11:32:43 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.gentoo.amd64 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20150523113243.63267cbe@marcec> |
Am Sat, 23 May 2015 10:49:07 +0200 schrieb Marc Joliet <[email protected]>: > Am Thu, 21 May 2015 09:36:28 +0000 (UTC) > schrieb Duncan <[email protected]>: > > [...] > > I decided > > to keep systemd, and ultimately, to unmerge openrc > [...] > > I forgot to ask about this: how did you go about doing that? I'm still waiting > for the following two bugs to be resolved: > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=504116 > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=511500 > > Do you have none of the affected packages installed, or...? Partially answering this myself: you must be using gcc-config-1.8-r1, and have none of the other still affected packages installed (e.g., java, hence no java-config-wrapper). Following bug #549508, I could put java-config-wrapper in package.provided and unmask gcc-config-1.8-r1. Then I should be able to put openrc in package.provided and finally depclean it. This should work as a temporary solution until bugs #504116 and #511500 are resolved. Does that sound sane? The only two scary looking bugs I found on gcc-config are 547586 and 547962. Bug #547586 is apparently completely benign (whitespace differences in "make check" output), whereas bug #547962 caused gcc-config-1.8-r1 to be hard masked. However, the underlying bug in gentoo-functions has apparently been fixed [0] (according to its ChangeLog this was done in version 0.8, which is arch), so it seems to me that the hard mask can be lifted. [0] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=547962#c5 -- Marc Joliet