Re: Re: How much value does llvm provide for a low-use laptop?
Marc Joliet <[email protected]> Tue, 18 Apr 2017 22:04:00 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.gentoo.amd64 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <114824845.s9gRMJLa9Y@thetick> |
--nextPart2492939.dF7Cr3s7mp Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Montag, 17. April 2017 03:17:21 CEST Duncan wrote: > Martin Vaeth posted on Sun, 16 Apr 2017 18:01:00 +0000 as excerpted: > > Duncan <[email protected]> wrote: > >> If you're not using radeon/amdgpu, you can probably disable it with > >> little consequence. > > > > Googleearth on intel's graphics card becomes unusable slow if mesa is > > compiled without llvm. > > Thanks. I wasn't aware Intel graphics used llvm too. Now I am. =:^) I'm not sure, but even if they didn't, AFAIK mesa uses LLVM to speed up CPU rendering, so you would probably want it regardless (my understanding is: in any case where a driver doesn't implement a particular OpenGL function, a software implementation can be used instead, and that can be accelerated/ optimised by LLVM). > Does anyone know about nVidia graphics, both servantware and freedomware? > I'm guessing the servantware doesn't use it, but the freedomware very > well could, if both Intel and AMD are doing so. I would be surprised if the nouveau driver didn't use LLVM, too, but I don't know for sure. No idea about nvidia. > And while we're on the topic, last I knew nVidia had no plans to do > wayland with their servantware at all. Any hints of that changing? No idea, sorry (also, I don't care ;-) ). Greetings -- Marc Joliet