Re: Gentoo Desktop - Proposal
Paul de Vrieze <[email protected]> Sun, 21 Mar 2004 21:15:28 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.gentoo.desktop.research |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--Boundary-02=_hffXAiac2NG9Mh6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 16 March 2004 10:49, [email protected] wrote: > hmmm, well, nautilus integrates badly with mozilla and soffice. epiphany > and gnome office are not competitive with koffice and konqueror. metacity > is even not integrated as well as kwm. > But well this is troll for now. Let try to agree on the concept/goal/need > first > One particular annoyance with respect to integration to me is the following: =2D I want the handler for a particular resource to be allways the same. Regardless of the calling application. Be it gnome, kde, mozilla, or mail= cap based. It should be similar. This probably will need some hacking, but le= t's bring some of the freedesktop standards to work and have kde and gnome cooperate. > > We should also release as often as the mainline gentoo releases to keep > > version numbering in sync as well as the improvments in the mainline. Gentoo mainline releases are still not really releases in the sense as gnom= e,=20 kde or even redhat has releases. It are just snapshots. > > Comments and suggestions? Look above ;-) Paul ps. Indeed control is still a key issue. =2D-=20 Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: [email protected] Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net --Boundary-02=_hffXAiac2NG9Mh6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBAXffhbKx5DBjWFdsRAqHpAJwPOFOevojTea2kczizyNdfaWYKWgCeKvHH utj+rNbB/dL3vzddWcdAZ3U= =fDhN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_hffXAiac2NG9Mh6--