digikam version bump?

"Andreas K. Huettel" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.gentoo.desktop
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi everyone,

just trying to find out- in your opinion,

* what needs to be fixed still for digikam-1._2_ to go into the tree?
* any particular problems that you know of with 1.3?

Also, is anyone else already working on this?

Only asking before I spend time on the next version bump... I am not using that program actively myself, so I'd need feedback.

Cheers, Andreas
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 836 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux)
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=7x1y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.