Re: Re: kde-sunset: new akode build problems
Brent Busby <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.gentoo.desktop |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, 22 Aug 2010, Duncan wrote: > FWIW, the type of breakage parallel make issues cause is, AFAIK, always a > build-time breakage. If it builds fine but fails at run-time, it's not > due to parallel make, but due to some other reason. That's excellent to hear! Well, I've enabled '-j3' then on two of my machines. They're both quad cores, and I'd like to always leave at least one core completely free. Thanks for the tip. > I've never met a desktop environment that I liked in default config. FWIW, > that's one of the reasons I'm a kde guy, as the lack of proper config > options for gnome drives me crazy. Even Linus Torvalds has griped about Gnome on that issue (which must have been very embarrassing for the Gnome devels...). I find myself using Gnome a lot at work though instead of KDE, because when I have all those desktop options, it makes me want to tweak them all day, and I can't help myself. At least with Gnome, my hands are tied, so then I can get some work done. :) > Early > kde4 was as pretty much everyone agrees now, simply a mess. 4.4 is a > reasonable release candidate, and 4.5 is honestly the first 4.x version I > can without qualms recommend to pretty much anyone and everyone.) I'll try it out again sometime... From what I've heard, Phonon actually works with pro audio apps a lot better than artsd ever did. (Actually what pro audio apps do with artsd is ignore and bypass it.) The last I tried KDE 4, I think they were at 4.2, and they didn't even have Konsole at a point where it didn't feel like a handicapped version with most of its features stripped. I thought that if they couldn't even make the terminal emulator work, what's the point. I'll give it another shot though. -- + Brent A. Busby + "We've all heard that a million monkeys + UNIX Systems Admin + banging on a million typewriters will + University of Chicago + eventually reproduce the entire works of + Physical Sciences Div. + Shakespeare. Now, thanks to the Internet, + James Franck Institute + we know this is not true." -Robert Wilensky