Re: System problems

Lindsay Haisley <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.gentoo.desktop
Organization FMP Computer Services
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 00:37 -0100, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> As such, I would kindly like to ask everyone on this thread to "calm
> down" and to please try to reply in a respectful manner to any poster on
> this ml.

Thank you, Jorge.  I will do so, going forward.

> I have to agree with other posters in this ml that your tone when you
> started this thread asking for help wasn't the best one.

I was kinda freaked out.  I depend on my desktop system for so many
things in a day, and it's _way_ behind in updates, I know.  I got pushed
into a kernel update by a simple software mod, which required a perl
update, which required that I run perl-cleaner, which has issues of its
own, and somewhere along the way I ran into a dependency on a newer
version of udev, which depended on a newer kernel, which I'd tried to
install before with the same or similar problems.  I couldn't make
things work and had to resort to a rescue disk to back out.  I felt
cornered, and I guess my plea for help showed it.

I actually have enough knowledge and experience with Linux that I can
probably solve this problem myself if I approach it methodically with a
clear head.

> Thank you for the apology you've sent to the list about your tone. Let's
> try to move forward and see if / how we can help you.

I can eat crow with the best of 'em, Jorge.

> PS - Lindsay, two last notes about your issue and your time constraints.
> This type of issue might be easier to diagnose on IRC (one good place is
> #gentoo in the freenode network) where a short intense session may prove
> to be quicker in the end. Also, I haven't seen anyone mention that the
> latest udev versions react *very* badly to CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED_V2.

Ah!  Thanks for the heads-up on this.  This switch is _not_ on in my
newer kernel, and doesn't exist in my older kernel.  CONFIG_SYSFS,
however, _is_ on as I assume it should be for /sys on which udev
depends.

I don't know why udev hasn't been completely integrated into kernel
development.  It's become so much a part of modern Linux and is so
interdependent with the kernel.  Yes, it's in user space, but so are
other kernel hooks.

> So be sure to check if you disable that as iirc udev will refuse to
> create the proper device nodes if that kernel option is active.

Question:  There are switch and value dependencies in the kernel that
are Gentoo specific, or specific to system configurations favored by
Gentoo (similar to what you mentioned above).  If I emerge a Gentoo
kernel, are the default configuration options for that kernel set by
Gentoo devs so as to build a kernel which will avoid these kinds of
"gotchas"?   In other words, if I build a gentoo kernel out of the box,
as opposed to a vanilla kernel from kernel.org, do I gain an advantage
with regard to possibly problematic configuration options on a fairly
standard Gentoo system?  I hope this makes sense.

> PPS - If you decide to test our IRC support, feel free to poke me in any
> channel or to /msg me in private.

Jorge, thank you SO MUCH, for this, (and for being an adult in the
sandbox.  I wasn't at the top of my game today :-) 

-- 
Lindsay Haisley       |  "Humor will get you through times of no humor
FMP Computer Services |      better than no humor will get you through
512-259-1190          |         times of humor."
http://www.fmp.com    |            - Butch Hancock
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.