Re: questions and sundry gripes about X11 multihead (it's a rant)
Brent Busby <[email protected]> Mon, 30 Dec 2013 10:05:19 -0600 (CST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.gentoo.desktop |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 30 Dec 2013, Fat-Zer wrote: > Could you be more specific? e.g. provide some links to bugs, mail > archives or whatever with subj discussions. I'm using multihead > ?Zaphod mode?, or whatever it's called, on nvidia's blob for 3 years > and haven't noticed any problems. (Except I had some KDE3/TDE-related > ones. But It's an another story...). Xorg.0.log yields that RandR is > disabled but I still can rotate/resize screen with xrandr. So I never > faced with issues you're talking about. On the other hand I'm a bit > concerned about all this situation. Because it would be damn sad if > whoever will drop support for it in future. Sorry, I was just in a bad mood and spewing generally about things. Just for starters though: http://phoronix.com/forums/showthread.php?20384-Zaphod-mode-with-the-Open-Source-Driver http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-x11/2013/06/29/msg001263.html I did get the impression during my trawl of the forums that the nVidia closed driver still offers some support for this configuration, but even that is depressing to me: As soon as we reach a point where only one non-FOSS driver is fully supporting a feature that used to be a basic part of X-Windows, it's basically dead. It's now become a perk of running nVidia hardware that will be with us for only as long as nVidia wants to continue indulging us. And that support only comes in a driver that the Linux kernel developers understandably don't like very much... -- + Brent A. Busby + "We've all heard that a million monkeys + Sr. UNIX Systems Admin + banging on a million typewriters will + University of Chicago + eventually reproduce the entire works of + James Franck Institute + Shakespeare. Now, thanks to the Internet, + Materials Research Ctr + we know this is not true." -Robert Wilensky