Re: news item: Introduction of app-alternatives/coreutils
Ulrich Müller <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.gentoo.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> On Fri, 20 Mar 2026, moltonel 3x Combo wrote: > A new app-alternatives/coreutils ebuild is available, giving the > choice between sys-apps/coreutils and sys-apps/uutils-coreutils as the > main coreutils (mkdir, ls, etc) implementation. The default will > remain the gnu implementation for the foreseeable future. Maybe these are heretic questions, but: 1. What problem does this solve? 2. Why do we need app-alternatives here, instead of a simple virtual (plus a blocker)? I find renaming (e.g. gls, gcp) and symlinking of all standard tools incredibly ugly. Ulrich
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 544 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFfBAEBCABJFiEEtDnZ1O9xIP68rzDbUYgzUIhBXi4FAmm/nysbFIAAAAAABAAO bWFudTIsMi41KzEuMTIsMiwyDxx1bG1AZ2VudG9vLm9yZwAKCRBRiDNQiEFeLnOR CAClnyveIOJCXhFby9NMU8Yf48U4h9cn4fGv+uz9pRsDKvUxCtvPSD2qNhbNm34I vhnjGpG9inSgSsLv/Z5e8bcw3dax6v9yn3zmlvZmD4IYqwzBFIsMLZXvqLlsayog 0BCAuj7oiE8Hdlij2hqrEcr+GRdkmpet/6b4Q1ztU6+5yWKFTC9mQJytYl1zkKrH +XCc/umJ3Q/5Y4L9+fi8wG06oeAl/GI7rEeDIPo0uIihn88vRPoCEQL3Oc/Asha+ lnsb7HgMwb5+Pj6p1L5JvS28WbdDMrxFEUagRdvfOG52d+xw3CwAIvzJnW5aMptb qAWTmz8AcDpRcbdDjv1wzJ/G =+x9u -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----