Re: Re: news item: Introduction of app-alternatives/coreutils

>>>>> On Sun, 22 Mar 2026, moltonel 3x Combo wrote:

> On Sun, 22 Mar 2026 at 15:01, Ulrich Müller <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > I just went with `g*` as suggested in the original bug report, but we
>> > could easily use `g-*` or `gnu*` or `gnu-*` to be a bit more unique.
>> 
>> Neither of these are very distinctive names, given that both coreutils
>> and uutils-coreutils describe themselves as "GNU coreutils".

> You seem to be playing the devil's advocate. That's not how the
> projects (or the ebuilds) describe themselves.

$ eix uutils-coreutils
* sys-apps/uutils-coreutils
     Available versions:  (~)0.2.2-r1^t (~)0.3.0^t (~)0.4.0^t (~)0.5.0^t (~)0.6.0^t **9999*l^t {debug selinux test LLVM_SLOT="17 18 19 (+)20 +21"}
     Homepage:            https://uutils.github.io/coreutils/ https://github.com/uutils/coreutils
     Description:         GNU coreutils rewritten in Rust
                          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQFfBAEBCABJFiEEtDnZ1O9xIP68rzDbUYgzUIhBXi4FAmnATogbFIAAAAAABAAO
bWFudTIsMi41KzEuMTIsMiwyDxx1bG1AZ2VudG9vLm9yZwAKCRBRiDNQiEFeLjeq
CADBPRIb8fUkkci9fNI8c35rsF0dbAnDFzGG187GFPoqGyFhAUsJ7nMmlX4HR7mQ
1lCyTeluE4FnTJqwYYF09i6znYpZTAhtgvnd+il3+VYSx4Q4r+bsxgLLWkuXH8sa
muGP9xOdWZXMzdNso/LZMyozxvQSQ4OcU1iXfwGZ/yQOGM7zulN/VjWOGlHc7UQO
lLBlFMYeZBoOJSylBs58dWEgaReOtmA4JNtEjaNg9N3h57Mr6Tyo2qoS2g2g9xE9
ICSYW2zffCHKICSmR74sPBTyweZwD32+rklcNZWcsG2sA9fRAbJu53YKr0+IUUaU
Gl1NDk8nxeruojXSBg7u+omN
=VpBB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----