Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] selinux-policy-2.eclass: respect the sanctity of -rN for EAPI=8
Kenton Groombridge <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.gentoo.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <adWR9_TKQkjLrGGB@fuuko> |
On 26/04/07 08:26AM, Rahul Sandhu wrote: > +# @ECLASS_VARIABLE: _SELINUX_POLICY_UPSTREAM_PV > +# @INTERNAL > +# @DESCRIPTION: > +# Internal variable representing (spoofed) upstream refpolicy version. > +_SELINUX_POLICY_UPSTREAM_PV=$(ver_cut 1-2) > + We aren't really spoofing the upstream versioning (even though it really doesn't mean anything). The Gentoo policy is updated in tandem with refpolicy, but only when refpolicy cuts a new release do the Gentoo policy packages use the new version, but it is admittedly by name only. Anyways, I think we can reword this to "[...] representing upstream base branch" or just drop the "(spoofed)" here so future readers don't get the wrong idea. -- Kenton Groombridge Gentoo Linux Developer, SELinux Project
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 1000 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKvBAABCgCZFiEEP+u3AkfbrORB/inCFt7v5V9Ft54FAmnVkxMbFIAAAAAABAAO bWFudTIsMi41KzEuMTIsMiwyXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25z Lm9wZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQzRkVCQjcwMjQ3REJBQ0U0NDFGRTI5 QzIxNkRFRUZFNTVGNDVCNzlFAAoJEBbe7+VfRbeejHsP/jJmBMrarazU/H2iS5SD y29kscYgC7W+RWMG4uZod8KG6mz8va+0ox1s2KvKa8xRtAE5xmG3YSpUsLe7ugrO V6v+v1GJzRrBZTjzDPrVBOoMHFNEoNneDcJseoB2ksbZbj4QXJnh41C1q1VMQnq8 yPcs4eZYqXKXA6CCT33aeR7crlU+Mh6iU6DYxhN8JxzwPD9wkvCCKdcKz/71YD8D nMkGY1Xx+TkfuZnXFVcxY+m3graMErpQVfBDElIocQpKSp1jSYVdYhXJpN96M0sJ l28LKCe3cuuF5ruv8KEo4DUBsh3Nq0cpc38gBpGT0GiA2S2mVVqpFS9/FY4mfLWG 6C052no2EuM34+hK+1qSk6nHWWRisMV4mUB/0QEv6zhjR363UqMyMTYGfqtjja/v sbn5mPztBAQBfJzCsjLzHa6AlIlCnkIKutL4TsENtcTV8g1NbUqiAtEXQhWMsTuV TIWSw+QqRqLigXHWSmJf/219IzfzqStppblK2X7gOtpMbQJrLjX45Ji3UPBxUbWk CwtNdTSS8erpfSWzAfYOKYlKH9WkAsywA2HJGX8UdbB7YhtHtw0gA6KWx2MwFR3b oQFNxQlofF3VZNh8ZbP6hLVTP3AAQpWJL8etQz9BJxtELz7kCg3qgQxxSsTGIvZP GZMA2zLchtvB3CCDOydnS4pB =rRCp -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----