Re: [RFC] Removing sys-kernel/vanilla-kernel
Sam James <[email protected]> Tue, 02 Jun 2026 18:13:06 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.gentoo.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Gentoo |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Mike Pagano <[email protected]> writes: > On 6/2/26 11:28 AM, Scott Ellis wrote: >> Just a lowly user of Gentoo > > You're exactly who I want to hear from. > > (for what feels like eons), but I only use >> vanilla-sources, for the reason that immolo gave: >> I've noticed there is a user base around >> sys-kernel/vanilla-sources. >> Their reasoning is they like pulling kernels directly from >> kernel.org <http://kernel.org> >> and this gives them a package manager solution for their needs. >> For tidyness, I try and have my systems only use packages. Sure, I >> could just grab sources from kernel.org <http://kernel.org>, but >> it's much nicer to have the ebuild take care of that for me, give me >> an easy way to apply local patches, etc. >> ScottE > > Would gentoo-sources with USE=vanilla satisfy your needs? I like this idea as it mirrors what we do with other packages and presumably would reduce work a bit as well. The only downside to it is that you get a rebuild/upgrade if genpatches includes a patch unnecessarily with USE=vanilla then. > > Mike
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 418 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEBBAEWCgCpFiEEJaa7iN2bdkxrVUHCc4QJ9SDfkZAFAmofDyIbFIAAAAAABAAO bWFudTIsMi41KzEuMTIsMiwyXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25z Lm9wZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQyNUE2QkI4OEREOUI3NjRDNkI1NTQx QzI3Mzg0MDlGNTIwREY5MTkwDxxzYW1AZ2VudG9vLm9yZwAKCRBzhAn1IN+RkMNl AP0erhEQomaDCiX/VEDVqWU3XDx60kTQsDh8AJ8TtEam9AEAsRjDhlXdvID3hStk ET4UJKiqPygULAhEaea781gNLgA= =4Ahd -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----