Re: [PATCH] vim-doc.eclass: Support installing in alternative ROOT
Anna Vyalkova <[email protected]> Sat, 13 Jun 2026 13:06:22 +0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.gentoo.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2026-06-11, Esteve Varela Colominas wrote: > Hi, I've been dealing with bug #917047[1] for a while, and I want to > try to push for a solution. To this end, I've created github PR > 46276[2], and previously sent an email, but I didn't get a response, > so this is the second attempt, hope I'm doing it right 😅. The patch > is appended to this email. I hope this change can be considered! Hi, if you are not aware I prepared (a bit overengineered) patchset for EAPI 9 + Neovim + vim.pack support in vim-plugin.eclass. There I decided to use a Perl script from Debian instead of vim-doc.eclass. (By the way, this patchset needs to be updated because vim-classic and EVi have appeared since then.) Eli Schwartz mentioned in the thread that there's a planned simplification of vim-doc.eclass: > Adding stripped-down perl implementations of vim seems out > of place (I have a planned simplification for helptags that will help > here). vimproved has a vastly simpler neovim support update I'd prefer > to look at (added to cc). https://public-inbox.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/[email protected]/ So, what's the current status on this matter?