Re: Cleaning up the consultants list
Francesco Riosa <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.gentoo.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAD6zcDz5nJFH2pVEjJ_UN7TmPHb1Cj8H4_WuwK9asNou_cVbVQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Il giorno lun 10 ago 2026 alle ore 15:58 Ulrich Müller <[email protected]> ha scritto: > >>>>> On Sun, 10 May 2026, Andreas K Huettel wrote: > > > We have a list of Gentoo consultants at > > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Foundation:Consultants > > > Several of the people on the list are (at least one of): > > > a) not active Gentoo developers anymore (and were inactive a while > > before being retired); > > > b) not actively contributing to Gentoo for a long time; > > > c) [not] reasonable entities for someone actually in need of a > > problem to get in contact with. > > > The list as-is is not particularly fresh or accurate, and the > > occasional duplication of person-as-consultant and > > one-man-company-as-consultancy feels silly. > > > How should we handle this, how can we provide useful and consistent > > information? > > Following up on this and (since there weren't any replies) CCing all > listed consultants. > > Please reply to [email protected] by 2026-09-10 and let us know: > a) whether your entry is still valid and accurate, > b) if you are listed more than once (e.g. as both a person and > a company), which entry should be kept. > > Entries for which we do not receive a response will be removed from > the consultant's list. > > Thank you in advance. > > Ulrich > Hi, I'm listed as Francesco Riosa (vivo) never had any contact deriving from being listed → feel free to remove me. Permit me one one observation though; the red in the column "Developer(s) on stuff" is a bit too much, something gentler like a pastel yellow may be more appropriate. Thanks to all (active and past) Gentoo supporters!