Re: Review of Documentation Policy

Matt Turner <[email protected]> Mon, 22 Aug 2011 20:16:59 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.linux.gentoo.documentation
Message-ID <CAEdQ38HKLYeEzFSaki2wx1q1aqtJ2kex3gXOPBdC5kiwLBpB3Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Sven Vermeulen <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > ... to inform the contributor about the time-consuming position and pressure the application involves.
>>
>> Come on. What is this? I don't think I remember getting paid as a
>> Gentoo developer. This nonsense about time commitments and pressure is
>> pretentious.
>>
>> It seems to me that the steps for joining the Docs team for a current
>> developer should be much more clearly stated.
>
> Any suggestion here? It isn't difficult to update the policy to be more
> real-life like (my own immediate suggestion would be to drop the "numbered"
> commit / bug requirement and instead use a regular mentoring role, and
> putting the responsibility of acknowledging in the mentor's lap) but we
> might even go beyond just "updating" the policy.

The information on this page is very irrelevant and confusing to me,
as a developer.

I don't know how many non-developer documenters we have. I don't know
what needs to happen to that text itself, but a section about how
current developers join the documentation team is important. Looking
at the page, a person must complete the staff and doc quizzes. For a
developer, it seems that the requirements should simply be 1) to have
become a developer and 2) completed the doc quiz.

Thanks,
Matt