Re: Review of Documentation Policy

Matthew Summers <[email protected]> Wed, 28 Sep 2011 13:36:30 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.linux.gentoo.documentation
Message-ID <CAET+hMScDpv9EoD7f+xSqJ692sNd9-Hn9ofk4K4NuU64PsfibA@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike) <
[email protected]> wrote:

> El 24/09/11 08:39, Sven Vermeulen escribió:
> > If we need a more objective metric to start with, I'd rather do it on
> > timeframe ("... sufficient document changes over a term of at least 4
> > months"), which holds twice then (first and second phase)
> It may be me but I'm still wondering why do you need an objective
> metric. Usually the project lead should be smart enough to know when to
> pull the rope and accept into the team a particular colaborator.
>
>
Checks and balances, my friend, checks and balances. I would be more
concerned about the lead _refusing_ the contrib or entry into the project of
a particular individual.

Cheerio
-- 
Matthew W. Summers
Gentoo Foundation Inc.