Re: Agenda for the meeting 2013-10-24 20:00UTC

"Anthony G. Basile" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 10/22/2013 07:49 PM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 10/22/2013 01:56 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
>> On 10/22/2013 01:09 PM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote:
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> On 10/21/2013 03:00 PM, Magnus Granberg wrote:
>>>> Agenda
>>>> 1.0 New Devloper
>>>> 2.0 Toolchain
>>>> 3.0 Kernel/Grsec/Pax
>>>>    3.1 Use pax_kernel
>>> The USE=pax_kernel is used for two reasons.  One reason is XYZ needs to
>>> be done or pax kills the build/test.  The second reason is XYZ needs to
>>> be done to build against a hardened kernel.
>> It is wrong to build anything against the kernel api except as defined
>> in /usr/include/linux, hardened or not.  We have lots of ebuild which
>> look at the kernel source tree in /usr/src/linux and build against it.
>> These are broken.  The kernel source tree exposes many internal
>> structures which are subject to change without notice, not the least of
>> which afflicted iptables for the longest time.
>>
>> By extension, no ebuild should build against a hardened kernel source
>> tree.  USE=pax_kernel should never mean "XYZ needs to be done to build
>> against a hardened kernel".  It should only be used to mean "the ELFs
>> provided by this package *may* be run under a kernel with pax memory
>> protection enforced."   If its a question of an out of source tree
>> kernel module being built and requiring a patch, eg constification, then
>> some other solution needs to be found.
>>
>> What ebuilds are we talking about here that fit the later category?
>>
> Kernel modules such as nvidia-drivers, which I'm confident are allowed
> to build against the kernel sources.
>
> - -Zero
>

Out of source tree kernel modules can (and often must) build against 
/usr/src/linux.  My comments were about userland.

Anyhow, back to the original issue, can't some local use flag be used 
here to say apply the constify patch?  We don't want to polute the 
meaning of USE=pax_kernel.

-- 
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail    : [email protected]
GnuPG FP  : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB  DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
GnuPG ID  : F52D4BBA
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.