Re: Help testing full end-to-end xattr support in portage
Luis Ressel <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
My kernel has been XT-only for ages now, so no change required here. I installed install-xattr and applied the portage patch. So far I've reemerged python:2.7 - it worked fine and the duration was much more bearable than with the python-based install wrapper (down from 8 minutes to 4 minutes, but still worse than the ~2 minutes in the good ol' days with vanilla install). I'll test more ebuilds in the next days. PS: I wonder if sys-apps/paxctl could be removed from the @system set now, as it's obsolete and superseded by elfix. Regards, Luis Ressel
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 966 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJTrJwBXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRBMjU3MDBFQTc5QkYzMkY4NEQzMTFGNDlD NzE4OTFBNkEwRUZCN0U5AAoJEMcYkaag77fpGfAP/34smRO47QEDnKEDikL7pPk7 AJE5noNFIDzMN6zi9rke3Kuwp3DOhTMH5ya2RgFNtAKAMlJ/x3Fl3c5IbT6IOd8j JaLezG2RF7/uZjdot+VHwj2SL3KrsKryMVXNUpbV7Ap5SpxUL8uZMCUBID6rtbx7 k6NGF5iFPBFj/hoXBu4hgnLiP3eImuVXEKtFVqJf9XspHCrDAo0eh6WvKdYRkGcu eaqaSbCYAOZ0LegvW4AVuf8l0qyrUCg9t4c/hlVH1b3OX4DP3Ih8pXjzDNBsWxL3 xyIUGUSogcOlmf9qQV/tUekn47iQWPieG6l4bnvTubW0KEvu6Msysjg0pJMK3ldH FsK4lJbnUGhyrG/GA38Axjeu9D/cPgCjROGsYvlvzd1X8oiNo8f/S7B0JnB2Qjfw Gt3bOEnbYc/NHBZkXHRR5/tIXUmfibb4opwKEcb0RFCusICmMp85CznXmZISnyrt +f+3+J40tsp/mJkjv7Q4yF8tLB6Z2xYKgiOpw7IyHZ1nx3IzCrwWx9WTfIyGL5ZM +w+uTYtUOFKhUBIXjHd8+up4l8zeX+q7IzDNwFKjPoxfTCPGDzZ92YN3XhqiJZsT qEkUNhj9St90ZynIN0FH+qjgWP/jUZNqb2A5+AwuQvBzRD1eue2qu+SE+otlaruE f2tb7ThF9yWDRS/BUvo/ =m04a -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----