Re: Help testing full end-to-end xattr support in portage
Luis Ressel <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I found another bug in dev-lisp/sbcl (#517008). sbcl does the pax-mark in src_compile() because it's already needed during the compile process itself. But the ebuild is also using sbcl's custom install.sh script during src_install() -- and this script, while it naturally did preserve ELF headers, doesn't preserve xattrs; therefore, a separate pax-mark in src_install() is required. I bet there are more bugs like this one in other packages. Btw: Should such bugs block #427888? Regards, Luis Ressel
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 949 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJTwlajXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRBMjU3MDBFQTc5QkYzMkY4NEQzMTFGNDlD NzE4OTFBNkEwRUZCN0U5AAoJEMcYkaag77fp00IQALAG13uVh2RaYMBSPEKGRCp8 gtuZXBP063WvUv+8bm4f7D+HK6D8td5qpinubPI2l4DV1uYUC4AsBZL04E47/Bot TBH3xMtbQUx1fm0om1oam82G6mStfFnAK4tCWWQnO6lqFmuAgC8V2TqzqYIE6EuA CMdPX+TNPWkSEe9CM37svJ+cCNya6Eun6/ZxZ9QHkQrVLT2uLD+SZvGlxb/F3lrO ErWWVwR22B4mCJnhOsd7cyIj3utc9asoS1eiK/J16SotXHEsdOKVJwfUfdJUtwYw lK55mJIjV4ehpO3CDOH4UZKSWG1SFMbfZLjtzl2wWm+tD3W+ExPFDtIORYTktC1l ueXyxap3vm77eM/RHrRhIEp0thyFiIaCsPducRcWLnH7JD1hcH42Ey4r1+iAj7xB C9hA4cTfGZpqTsJHOnBRwXUVjQhGwl6pCL7n0xBGw/0sRly8LA8IF2S6L/0zOYs3 NrZM32z8v5iV7B9dUDhyH9EDomgjud0QgOSoUVQdbmAkQxk1ejLnEiakLiRyZF6o IGTxkDEss3K4tdCymZ98zwfU4Wz2jNnVJU8x1v0WMhMzdeB2WJMqQqQLm1HPOmSr 3KsfshT5Fq1hQYq2Hz16P2yVJ+5P7IzdQyPGwYyvM4lYuOa83CTK4NTwE5+dpBSj yYOrnsT3s0oYzi+8xPv5 =djK8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----