Re: [PATCH] fix sys-process/cronie compilation under gentoo+musl

understood, better yet, I'll ask blueness probably how does he wants the patches.

thanks for the explanation.

> Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2014 at 9:33 AM
> From: "Tóth Attila" <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] [PATCH] fix sys-process/cronie compilation under gentoo+musl
>
> Musl is ment to be an alternative to libc. Some of the hardened folks
> (perverts ;->) are interested to make it work on Hardened Gentoo. But musl
> itself is not necessary hardened per se. You've linked the Hardened
> project subpage. The package maintainer happens to be a hardened developer
> (blueness). So your message probably reaches him. But it's not the optimal
> channel. So what pageexec tried to advise, is to open a bug in the gentoo
> bug tracking system and attach your patches and diffs to the bug. But I
> still suggest to attach a single diff per file. And don't try to use diff
> as a version control system. Specify sys-libs/musl in the title and the
> description and it will reach the maintainer of the package, will probably
> got assigned to him.
> 
> https://bugs.gentoo.org
> 
> Regards:
> Dw.
> -- 
> dr Tóth Attila, Radiológus, 06-20-825-8057
> Attila Toth MD, Radiologist, +36-20-825-8057
> 
> 2014.November 15.(Szo) 06:25 időpontban daggs ezt írta:
> > Greetings,
> >
> >> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 at 11:52 PM
> >> From: "PaX Team" <[email protected]>
> >> To: [email protected]
> >> Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] [PATCH] fix sys-process/cronie
> >> compilation under gentoo+musl
> >>
> >> On 14 Nov 2014 at 22:05, "Tóth Attila" wrote:
> >>
> >> > I would suggest to attach the responsible patch of the missing define
> >> only
> >> > and the necessary diff of a given ebuild file. That two files could be
> >> > enough, I guess.
> >>
> >> yes and probably choose a better list and/or open a bugzilla entry as i
> >> doubt
> >> this is hardened related at all ;).
> >>
> >>
> >>
> > not sure I understand the latter, this is a issue that is caused by
> > running gentoo atop of musl, according to this wiki page,
> > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Hardened_musl I should send the
> > patches to this list.
> >
> > am I wrong?
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
>