Re: RIP hardened-sources

Paweł Hajdan, Jr. <[email protected]> Sat, 29 Apr 2017 17:30:28 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 29/04/2017 15:11, Alex Efros wrote:
> Sure, they can sell their patch to Linux kernel without opensourcing that
> patch. But at soon as their customers (say, some government org or large
> company) will APPLY that patch to Linux kernel and try to DISTRIBUTE that
> kernel on their computers - they will have to distribute patched source
> too (so it'll became available to users of these computers), and that
> patched source will have GPL2 license… so any of these users/employees may
> publish these sources, and org/company can't prohibit this without
> violating GPL2… correct?

See the discussion on https://lwn.net/Articles/720983/ .

Paweł
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 827 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2
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=Q/g5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----