Re: RIP hardened-sources
Paweł Hajdan, Jr. <[email protected]> Sat, 29 Apr 2017 17:30:28 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 29/04/2017 15:11, Alex Efros wrote: > Sure, they can sell their patch to Linux kernel without opensourcing that > patch. But at soon as their customers (say, some government org or large > company) will APPLY that patch to Linux kernel and try to DISTRIBUTE that > kernel on their computers - they will have to distribute patched source > too (so it'll became available to users of these computers), and that > patched source will have GPL2 license… so any of these users/employees may > publish these sources, and org/company can't prohibit this without > violating GPL2… correct? See the discussion on https://lwn.net/Articles/720983/ . Paweł
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 827 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJZBLGZAAoJEOOGGXc/wLdawhUP/jYp0W95vc7oWoLMQDFaWHjQ x7YnBcWlT/dAqeJPX2WD5Z9vKJr2wBO+aOdQMIJmHPOBP0wDZeh2DDadL7nQlfRU LI8DAJBZ5Bxd6iTYSlMvYelCSyj75XijX1oqWPq8hx3Oe4kHcM032H6KibVbG/rq Cn4KmboGkZXXaULBfOAIppOehfhPqdlCdzDzGhByJqy9ID0iwJO8xwOtCvFXFzL1 XW/SkapcwmCE7leUdY69tc/V5b6kjkf9VyFk1yo6p1hm+Jv2/3Xw5qKVGx9ADIR/ +RK1OSIs7ZnLi3g5g5RXAzsR2kCREyQSSMeTj7s6mHT9CebCN/TKELQljYRZB5Jn t8t9Uu9WbyJZ44hyBLFn3keb7kBbp3J9rHjNOf3oXDJD5deTQArWgRfqzwEMx41n QGYm4yNBH55cvQLzDSYLagdHArNrckfZ5hWCgPU5mbT2RsvIZXTLQu2BSKYVbKsf X0S5MWMKUXYVEE14aePh19V7KNVj+JpqeWfiXnEV9BQ+rkivSoqWa8TVD/KcQnvz EobADEQKQFjKTSyxMrrp0Kh4xklaONoIyJYy/cbV6kvMJCiMbmq4OWM+/f30RDn8 adCrloJfRXoeOi/o40SYAAJ2jfRXP2tYKZG9+FBUDXugqm92MqKpuEuGdK338gnX S/HwBH/XXnsJYVy//Z3w =Q/g5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----