Re: RIP hardened-sources

And it's not about money from what I've read, should read this if you
want some more information :
https://hardenedlinux.github.io/announcement/2017/04/29/hardenedlinux-statement2.html

On 04/30/2017 01:50 PM, SK wrote:
> You can't really change license because it is a kernel patch so it has
> to be GPLv2 from what i understand.
>
>
> On 04/30/2017 01:08 PM, Alex Efros wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 07:46:10PM +0300, Alex Efros wrote:
>>> Thanks! But isn't this mean you forbid all Linux distributions (including
>>> commercial ones like RedHat) to be GrSec/PaX subscribers (in case they
>>> like to spend some money for it)? I.e. this decision will ensure majority
>>> of Linux systems will never ever have GrSec/PaX
>> If no one is replies on this yet because that's sad truth, then may I ask
>> why don't you like to solve this in some way?
>>
>> For example, you can continue publishing source of GrSec/PaX versions, but
>> use license which allows using it for free only for personal use and small
>> business (say, less than 10-20 computers) on usual desktop/server PC.
>> This way all server/desktop Linux distributions will be able to include
>> alternative hardened kernel or have alternative hardened variant of
>> overall distribution, but end-user will have to decide is they can use it
>> for free or should subscribe or avoid using it.
>> For Android phones/tablets and embedded devices you can make separate
>> clause in license to let you get some money from Google and companies
>> developing embedded devices if they will like to use GrSec/PaX, without
>> forbidding such a possibility at all (rumours are current subscription
>> options require to limit amount of installations, which is surely doesn't
>> makes sense for Android).
>>
>> This way you shouldn't lose any money comparing to current situation,
>> it also solve mentioned before issues when bad companies sell unsupported
>> and modified GrSec variant and use "grsecurity" for marketing own
>> products. Plus you'll continue wide-test your patch with Gentoo Hardened
>> and some other distribution users and have your patch available for any
>> external audit which is always good for security product's karma.
>>
>> If there are no good reasons to reject proposed solution and no
>> alternatives to let people continue using GrSec/PaX for personal/small
>> business use, then, yeah, conspiracy theories and three-letter-agencies
>> start coming to mind - just because they wins more than anybody else
>> including yourself if all Linux distributions won't have GrSec/PaX anymore.
>>
>