Re: Technical repercussions of grsecurity removal

Daniel Cegiełka <[email protected]> Tue, 2 May 2017 17:56:22 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened
Message-ID <CAPLrYEQtXGwW==LeReb4mhiHgygvogQwOWygN_230p4k3qmetg@mail.gmail.com>
2017-05-02 17:28 GMT+02:00 Luis Ressel <[email protected]>:
> On Mon, 1 May 2017 09:38:43 +0000
> Sven Vermeulen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> The obvious step is indeed to stop further *current* development on
>> hardened-sources. I don't know how many additional patchsets are being
>> implemented in it (blueness? Zorry?) so I don't know if it means that
>> hardened-sources in total is done with or not.
>
> All patches in our current patchset
> (hardened-patches-4.9.24-1.extras.tar.bz2) are grsec-related. Most of
> them don't even touch the kernel code, but only the Kconfig's. So
> unless we manage to maintain PaX, we can indeed kiss hardened-sources
> goodbye.

and, of course :)

grep -r -e paxmark -e pax_kernel /usr/portage/