Re: Official project position on grsecurity change in release policy?

--61jdw2sOBCFtR2d/
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 2017-05-11 09:31, Max R.D. Parmer wrote:
> Howdy,
>=20
> Perhaps I missed it, but I've been so far unable to find a position/plan
> for the future of hardened-sources from the Gentoo Hardened project
> members. I've searched the site and mailing list archives. Has any such
> statement been made?
>=20
> I see there are some efforts to create a community maintained version of
> the PaX/Grsecurity patchset[1][2], this seems to be a likely forward
> course, but is integrating it the plan of the Hardened project or does
> that remain to be seen?
>=20
>=20
> [1]: https://github.com/thestinger/linux-hardened
> [2]: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Hardened_Kernel
>=20
> Thanks for any additional insight you might provide,
> Max

There=E2=80=99s been discussion on it, but I don=E2=80=99t know if we have =
come to a
decision.

https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-hardened/threads/2017-05/

--61jdw2sOBCFtR2d/
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iL4EAREKAGYFAlkVvI5fFIAAAAAALgAoaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl
bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDRGNEVENDM2QzYzRDAwQTdCNDYzQTQwMDI4
OTc2MzczNjFENjJENUQACgkQKJdjc2HWLV0t0QD/bcjfMC9gf10ZVqQuoZngMx8X
5BQm9+JfvyXuLN5unZoA/AkNaKHCfdHs6EoyiOkinmTwO+DlDfpzpyGkZBdqn+UB
=Tpwu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--61jdw2sOBCFtR2d/--