Re: [gentoo-ppc-dev] Gentoo Installer partitioning arch support
Nathaniel McCallum <[email protected]> Thu, 22 Apr 2004 21:13:40 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.gentoo.ia64,gmane.linux.gentoo.alpha,gmane.linux.gentoo.amd64 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--=-7tK3eu4Hl0t73szB2oaq Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2004-04-23 at 02:58 +0200, Luca Barbato wrote: > Nathaniel McCallum wrote: > > Sorry to cross post like this, but this is the best way to reach > > everyone. We at the GentooInstaller project are beginning work on our > > partitioning section, one of the arch dependant aspects of the > > installation. I need to know if sfdisk will work as a scriptable > > replacement for fdisk on all the various arches. If you aren't sure, > > could you test it, and get back to me? Thanks! > >=20 > > Nathaniel McCallum > you can't use sfdisk on ppc,could we use parted for everybody? It=20 > has/should have support for every diskslice/partition format we use and=20 > should allow us to repartition dinamically on x86. >=20 > Comments? The plan was to originally use parted (which I still prefer). I made an ebuild for redhat's parted python bindings (in bugzilla), but it isn't in portage yet (needs a patch and version bump on parted). HOWEVER, I don't believe parted supports all arches. Specifically, I believe parted has "minors" hard coded as type int, which doesn't work on one arch (I believe alpha) as it uses letter based minors. I could be wrong though... But to your knowledge parted DOES work on ppc? Anyone else? Does parted work on your arch? Thanks! Nathaniel --=-7tK3eu4Hl0t73szB2oaq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBAiG3E/t09+yCbKx4RAlgoAJ9bP9yWhEjSKsml3yBGQFxwQMMJDwCdFeMs Qw5qnH8p+tyXhEoLbNzINmo= =CQtq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-7tK3eu4Hl0t73szB2oaq--